Read these TWO articles about the Apple iPhone encryption debate Forbes Article USA Today Article Write THREE complete sentences stating your view. Reply to someone's blog in TWO complete sentences- Sign your name.
In this case of the FBI VS. Apple, I am neutral in this situation. I see the view of both sides and I agree with both sides. The FBI made a good point by looking into this terrorist's phone, but Apple doesn't need to or want to.
I think Apple has the precedent in which it should not be forced to write code to get into the iPhone. However, I do think the FBI has a very good reason for looking into the phone. I think they need to find a middle ground where the FBI gets into the phone without Apple tarnishing its brand.
I understand that the FBI wants to hack into this phone so that they can get information about the attacker. However, I believe that Apple should keep their security the way it is. Creating a backdoor could make Apple customers vulnerable to other hackers using that software.
However, any skilled hacker could make this code themselves and if they get their hands on your phone, they could hack into it with ease. Therefore, this backdoor has been open for a long time. ;)
Well I kinda agree and disagree about it. Well yes Apple customers needs privacy on their phone, but if the FBI needs to see your phone, they haft to hack on the phone
The FBI should have Apple's assistance in this situation. Although Apple is not required to help, they could potentially save lives by using the find to track other terrorist attacks. Human lives are more important than a company's policy. - Alex Rahi
I agree that it could save lives and avoid attacks. I also think however that the software Apple would create to hack the phone could be given to the wrong people and this could compromise the security of all the iPhone owners.
Just because they can, doesn't mean they have to. The FBI can think of and suggest other solutions to this, or come to a compromise with Apple rather than force them into doing something they don't want to do for a reason. This could potentially ruin the future of Apple.
I don't think Apple should be forced to help the FBI hack the phone. The FBI has the rights to the phone, but I do not think they have the right to force Apple to create a code, which is considered speech under the first amendment. I think this would be a violation of Apple's constitutional rights to free speech.
I agree with you that Apple should not be forced to hack the iPhone by the FBI. The fact that the code and what is on the phone are considered free speech is something we need to protect as a nation and a people. -Eric Potak
I believe Apple should write the code so the FBI can get information in the phone. However, I don't think they should be forced to do so because under the law they are not. I think they need to come to a mutual agreement on this situation.
I get the whole "Tarnishing the apple Brand", but the reasoning for the code was a situation that involved a threat to national security, also it could possibly prevent other attacks. I don't believe it would make apple consumers feel unsafe with there privacy. There needs to be a win-win situation for the FBI and Apple. What I do like is how Apple is exercising their rights in the Constitution.
In this case, i believe Apple should get the FBI into their phone, the data contained on this phone could help prevent future terrorist attacks and also lead to the people that organized the attacks. I could see how apple could think that it would invade their customers privacy, but stopping future attacks on our country and the people in it,is more important.
I understand why the FBI would want to look at the phone. If code is considered speech, then I do not think the FBI can force Apple to write the code that would allow the FBI to get this data. I think that Apple is also being reasonable since this could affect how private people perceive iPhones as being.
I agree with you on all accounts. I think the FBI needs to recognize precedence in terms of code being protected, but I think we should try to prevent terrorism.
It seems that complying to the court ruling will just cause problems for Apple. Breaking their own security hurts the brand and national reputations. Even if Apple wrote the code, the FBI would still have to try combinations before they get in. We don't even know if the data on this phone is worth it! I'm sure we can find a hacker somewhere that can do this.
While I personally believe that Apple should comply with the FBI, ethically it is wrong. This would make Apple users exposed in terms of security. However, this phone can have information that will provide valuable information that could help the FBI in their investigation. Both sides make understandable arguments, but I believe that Apple should not be forced to provide codes to help the FBI in this case. -Nuhash Bhuiyan
I think both sides have a reason but i think the FBI's reason is more important. Apple doesnt want to give up their codes to the FBI but this is about a terrist attack. This selfishness by apple could cost many american lives and that is something we should not risk
In my opinion, the FBI should receive this information. It is crucial to figuring out who was working with the terrorists, but Apple is right; if they use this code, it could make Apple users uneasy. In my opinion, there is no reason that they should be uneasy. Apple would use this code against anyone else and the code doesn't pull information out.
By doing this, Apple could potentially expose all of their customers. Depending on how many people are used to make this code that Apple is being asked to make, are you sure that you can trust all of them not to let it out to the public?
The FBI have the right to search on your phone only if there something suspicious. But Apple should have the code only for suspicious scene. Because it will ruin the customers private policy if the FBI just hack whoever they want to
I think that Apple should not be mandated to give the phone to Apple. If the code is considered speech, then the government would be violating the first amendment. Regardless of who owns the phone, I think that apple should not unlock it. - Sudeep Yedulla
I think Apple should let the FBI hack into the terrorists phone. Even though Apple isnt required to help they should because it can prevent future terrorist attacks. I think that would be best but it could ruin the Apple brand and reputation because they are not required to help and they are exposing private information. -Rhea Farooq
The phone might not have any relevant information that would prevent terrorism. I think Apple should not help since this code could be used on other iPhones.
I see the FBI's point of view, but I believe security, privacy, and rights of the people are more important in this case. Why doesn't the FBI hire an independent hacker to get into the phone instead of bullying Apple to? And if Apple writes the code, it could cause other security issues..
I agree with you. You are right that they should get an independent hacker to hack the phone and get the information they are looking for, and Apple shouldn't be forced to do this for FBI. -Fatemeh Razfar
I'm on FBI's side and i think that our safety is more important. I know that Apple shouldn't be forced to hack the phone but maybe there is something in the phone that would help us find a way. -Fatemeh Razfar
I think that both Apple and FBI make reasonable arguments. Forcing Apple to write the code might make regular users vulnerable. However, I think that Apple should provide the codes for the FBI because the phone could potentially prevent another terrorist attack.
iPhone users want their privacy safe and secure. Privacy is just another one of those little things that make a huge selling point and provides people with comfort and full freedom to take full advantage of the iPhone's power. This case isn't impossible, maybe if the code was written secretly, but immediately patched before using it, Apple can send an update to all iPhones that installs this patch. -Waseem Idelbi
I think that both Apple and The FBI make reasonable arguments about this topic. If the FBI made Apple write a code, it could get out to the public and be used for the wrong reasons. Although, it could help prevent future attacks against our country if the FBI were able to get into the phone and uncover the data inside
In the case of Apple being forced to hack into the San Berandino shooter's phone is special. I believe that Apple should not be able to hack into the phone as once this technology is created, this information can become leaked, threatening iphone users around the world. This inevitable invasion of privacy is against the most fundamental constitutional rights of being an american citizen.
I don’t think the FBI should be able to do that. Apple has the right to do what they want to their company so, it isn’t right for them to take them to court. FBI has some points but not enough for them to get cell phone access.
I think that Apple really has no choice on this matter because they have been ordered by court once already and they don't have a strong enough defense to beat the odds. Apple almost should have a feeling of needing to do this even if they have to say its for the family's for those who died. Its not like they are doing it to ever ones phone or they have to hack it all they really need to do is turn off the fail safe.
I agree Cameron, if they can make it, I believe it eventually will be leaked and used for bad intentions. If apple can make this code to unlock peoples phone,so can hackers.
I believe Apple should not comply with the FBI to hack this dudes phone. If they do it to one person they should be able to do it to everyone, and eventually the code will get out to the public or get leaked, that would be disaster. Apple would be doing the right thing not helping the FBI
i sort of agree to what connor said but at the same time the FBI are just doing their job. if by going through one person phone will help the nation apple should at least work something with the FBI
Because it helps America become safer I think that Apple should help the FBI. They may not want to do it for the safety of their customers, but if they give the FBI the information then they can help more than just their customers. Apple shouldn't be able to go against a court order either because it makes them seem above the law, which they aren't.
I agree with you because apple should do it for the safety of their customers not the fear of losing them. Apple shouldn't go against the court order they were given.
I can see how by giving the FBI the codes it could make all the regular customers vulnerable because they have no privacy whatsoever. However, for cases that could prevent future terrorist attacks I think the FBI should get the codes from Apple. Both the FBI and Apple make valid arguments in this case.
I agree with you because if Apple customers wanted America safe them they would allow the FBI to look at the terrorist's phone knowing that they shouldn't have anything to hide. If they did have something that they don't want them to find, then they probably shouldn't have it.
I believe apple should help the FBI because it could help prevent the terrorist attacks or minimize them. But Apple should live up to their word and keep peoples privacy. Since they went to court for it I would have just given them the pass code.
i'm not really sure which side i should take because both make sense. The FBI job is to protect the nation against terrorist if by going through apple phone will help them apple should give it to them FBI just doing their job. At the same time people need their privacy as a smartphone company is their job to protect the privacy of their customer.
Think about it this way, if people were the targets of terrorist attacks, then I think that they would give up their privacy. If Apple does help them then many lives could be saved in the future. Would you give up your life for privacy? (Amanda)
I think apple should let the FBI hack into the phone for many reasons. My first reason is they can possibly save millions of lives, second they might be able to find the locations of the people that are going to attack and when the will. But at the same time i dont because some important info might spread to the public.-Daunte Barden.
i would agree because it would save lives if they had access to the phone, but what if the phone has nothing on it. How would that affect us going through all this trouble for nothing.
I think apple should hack into the phone because it can prevent future terrorist attacks. It is not invading privacy if it is preventing people from getting killed. apple cant disobey the court order they were given Megan
I agree with you because it is for the better of America and their safety. You are right about it not invading privacy because it prevent people from getting killed and it can prevent future terrorist attacks.
I agree with you! If we are preventing future attacks then we are saving lives. But also someone could accidentally or purposely release the code and then people can be hacking into other peoples phones. Being nosy because they have nothing better to do with their life.
I'm going to have to agree to disagree with you on that. The fact that it might prevent people from getting killed doesnt change the fact that it's invading privacy... and apple can disobey the court order because code is considered speech and so they have the right to not do anything
I think that Apple and the FBI both have arguments that go against each other for reasons they prioritize. Apple has to protect its users but also if the code they made for the FBI were to get out it could cause serious damage for the company and also its users by creating a way into it's security. However, from the FBI side by getting this information they could potentially stop a future attack by getting into it.
I believe that apple should not open the phone up for the FBI. It is a violation of privacy which apple has a contract with its customers. And if apple does let the fbi get access to the phone. Then what about other countries which has the same situation? would you give china or Russia access to apple iphones within there countries? - nyle
I also agree with what you're saying and that giving the FBI access can bring up many questions. One of which is if they do get access then is there really such a thing as personal privacy? -Anmol P.
Its never been seen that way and I like the angle your coming from what if other countries got access to the code a lot more than 14 lives could be at stake.
I believe that Apple should not be forced to open up iPhones for the FBI to investigate. Even though terrorism is something that should be prevented, it should happen in legal ways. Forcing businesses to unlock their technology is dangerous because hackers with mal-intentions can get in as well. The FBI should only be able to get the information on the phone if they have a warrant to the information. - Rahul Soni
From my understanding the FBI is requesting a so called "backdoor" for the iPhone, and for future ios. Apple has refused because its simply a invasion of privacy.It is also dangerous because if this "backdoor" is leaked then anyone could hack into anyone's iPhone. This leads to more devices being susceptible to ransom-ware where anyone could lock you out of your device. It is also somewhat a matter of security because the information on the phone could be valuable, and prevent future attacks. -Brandon Manautou
I think that Apple should work with the FBI. If the customers become terrorists then I believe their right to privacy gets taken away. Also if doing this can prevent the lives of many in the future, then this should be done for the common good. (Amanda Le)
I understand that the information on the phone could be valuable,and prevent future attacks.But if it were leaked many people would be able to get in other people devices,and do malicious things.How many rights do we have to give up for our safety? -Brandon Manautou
I agree with you! These terrorists have lost their right to privacy. But there's no way to put a cap on it. Once a back door is opened up or written into the apple contract then everyone loses their right to privacy even law abiding citizens.
I believe Apple should not have to succumb to the court order that forces the company to create code to hack into the iPhone. I think a backdoor would be a great resource to go further into evidence, but it breaks many laws. As a company, Apple should not have to ruin its image and reputation. I think there should be a middle ground between the FBI and Apple, where evidence can still be attainable.
I agree that there should be some middle ground that should be worked out. Initially I was against FBI breaking into the phone's data at all costs, but now I realize with the consent of the county and the protection of the nation, there should be some middle ground that both the FBI and Apple agree to solve this issue. -Ansh Chaudhari
I don't think apple should have to code a backdoor method to get into the iphone. Legally speaking, code is considered speech so apple has the right to not "say" anything. It's a violation of rights and apple isn't doing anything wrong in my opinion.
That's interesting. I never thought of code as a form of speech. In that sense, it would coincide with the first amendment with freedom of speech, and if FBI forces them, they would be violating that amendment. -Ansh Chaudhari
I disagree Daniel. There might be information about future attacks or more people that were involved in this attack that could help the FBI. In these circumstances I think apple should open the phone. They do have a warrant.
I agree with you. Typing code is almost the same as saying something, like texting someone is conveying a message. Therefore, code should be considered under free speech in the First Amendment.
I think that Apple is right in choosing to deny the FBI access to the iPhone. To me, this is not a question of just stopping terrorists but also a matter of maintaining our personal privacy. I do think that a middle ground can be met because I believe personal privacy is a very important thing that we must maintain. -Anmol P.
Apple should comply and help the FBI, overall their compliance will do more good than harm. If apple can help the FBI make a 'backdoor' then it could help get into many more criminals phones and would better the world. Apple is not above the law and it should be happy to help a country that is trying to keep its citizens safe.
What law would Apple technically be trying to be above? And how would we know that the backdoor would not be hacked and used for more wrong causes than right?
Maybe for this one particular situation it may do good, but it doesn't mean that invading privacy is good overall. You wouldn't allow the FBI to invade someone's house if they were looking for information without taking the right steps, so would you allow it in this situation. Citizens have a right to privacy and its the governments job to secure the citizens while protecting our rights. - Rahul Soni
i agree but there should be warrants to allow to get threw the phone. i wouldn't want to give the government full access unwarranted searches threw a phone. other wise we'd mistakenly be recorded or track for suspicious behavior when we didn't do anything. The People should have some what a privacy.
I totally agree, by searching the phone the FBI could find terrorist connections and possibly stop someone else from being killed. I dont think apples privacy policy applies to a terrorist. Especially if the FBI have a legal warrant to search the phone anyway.
Even though the FBI only wants to find out information regarding a terrorist attack Apple does have a policy that they have to stay by. Forcing Apple to have to open the IPhone would not make it okay, plus after doing it once other government agencies would expect Apple to do it again. -Gracie Lopez
I agree with Apple to a certain extent and I don't blame the FBI for taking this to court. However all of us have the right to privacy. If Apple does open up a back door it gives up the security and privacy of their users along with giving the company a bad name. I understand the FBIs concern but I don't necessarily think that hacking into a phone will give them all the information they need.
The FBI should not be able to receive access to the iPhone from Apple due to the many security issues that could rise. If the software backdoor is created, it brings up many other cases of which governments of other countries such as China and Russia can request access to iPhones, as Apple is an international company. People could also feel unsafe with Apple products if they know that there is a software that could be used to access all of their personal files and such.
I strongly disagree Sumanth. Which do you value more? Privacy or lives? This case and many just like it can help save lives and prevent future terrorist attacks.
Think about the possibility of more lives being lost due to terrorists' access to a program that could give them access to all private files on peoples' cell phones. Private details could be exposed to people who want to do wrong.
What the FBI is doing is forcing Apple to give them a way to bypass the security of anyone's phone. If you were to do that, then there would be a code made specifically for invading privacy. Now I agree that the FBI should not be able to force Apple to create a code as it is a direct violation of the first amendment; however I also know that the FBI hires some of the best coders in the world and if they really wanted to get into the phone all that they would have to do is have one of their coders write something up.
Forcing Apple to create a code that bypasses the encryption is wrong. Apple should not be forced to create a code that will allow others to get entry into someone else's phone. If such a code is created, private security will be lost and hackers will have easy access to personal information. Although this is for national defense and security, the FBI cannot force Apple to do this. -Ansh Chaudhari
I like apples policy on privacy and how far they are going to keep it. On the other hand I also believe they should make exceptions on certain cases like this one. I am caught in the middle in this situation but if I had to make a choice I would have to go with apple shouldn't make the code or at least shouldn't have to.
Legally Apple is not required to grant access to the terrorists phone. The FBI has little to no information about this attack. And without out knowing why, or who triggered the deaths of innocent people we can't fix anything, or prevent any of these viscous attacks to reoccur. Considering the circumstances, I think Apple should comply with the FBI to try and figure out why these terrorists attacked.
I think that apple should unlock the phone. If this a national security risk and if the FBI has a legal warrant to search the phone to prevent further attacks and to find out terrorist connections then by all means hack the phone.
I understand that national security is a big concern in this case, but what happens after this incident? Will the FBI or any third party be allowed to hack into someone's phones and that be ok? The risks ,in my opinion, do not outweigh the rewards in this case and would case more issues down the road.
I think that Apple has a right to protect their technology and the privacy of their customers. However, I also think that the government is responsible for protecting the citizens of the US, and that this phone is a fundamental key to help the government do their job. In this case I think that the government should be given a backdoor by Apple to bypass the encryption, as whatever information on the phone that could be used to find possible terrorists, is more important than keeping the privacy of their customers. -Brinda
I agree with the fact that the FBI needs to protect its citizens, but I believe that Apple should not have to create the code to unlock the iPhone. This is because the code is protected by the first amendment and this technology could also potentially be used in a harmful way. -Kaitlyn Pollock
I believe that Apple should not be required to open up the iPhone. It is a slippery slope and illegal searches and seizures have been outlawed for centuries. Not only that, but they decided that the what was on the iPhone is considered speech, and first amendment rights are in jeopardy if we illegally search that iPhone -Eric Potak
I think in this case Apple should work with the FBI. I understand that we're all entitled to our privacy but what privacy is there when it's involved with terrorist attacks and our societies safety? Apple isn't above the law, simply they wanna make sure we're safe. -Arihanna Caforio
I understand why the FBI would want to have Apple unlock the iPhone, but I believe that the United States government cannot force Apple to do this. Due to the fact that Apple would have to make a code to do this and one of the articles said that code is part of freedom of speech the government should not force Apple to unlock the iPhone. Also the problem is this new code could potentially be realized to the public and be used in a negative way. I also understand the FBI reasoning of needing the phone unlocked to protect against possible terrorist attacks. Overall, despite the FBI's reasoning I believe Apple should not be forced to create a code to help unlock the iPhone.
I agree with you saying that code is considered free speech and as such by forcing Apple is infringing upon their rights to free speech, however I think that the security of people is much more important. It doesn't seen logical to say that the government should protect the privacy and livelihoods of the citizens, and not protect the actual lives of said citizens. This is a matter of national security and Apple could and should be more cooperative with the government on the matter of this phone.
Why should this case be any different to past cases where the government has needed an Apple phone to be opened for the case. That's the point it should't, plus it could just be a dead end.
In this case of the FBI VS. Apple, I am neutral in this situation. I see the view of both sides and I agree with both sides. The FBI made a good point by looking into this terrorist's phone, but Apple doesn't need to or want to.
ReplyDelete-Ian Nester
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteI think Apple has the precedent in which it should not be forced to write code to get into the iPhone. However, I do think the FBI has a very good reason for looking into the phone. I think they need to find a middle ground where the FBI gets into the phone without Apple tarnishing its brand.
ReplyDelete-Michael Logue
I agree with you. Apple should put their security pride behind themselves and help the FBI at a middle ground.
DeleteI agree with you. But Apple users shouldn't be worried about Apple using this code.
DeleteI agree with you. The FBI has a good reason to get into the phone, but a billion dollar company's reputation is a risk here.
DeleteI understand that the FBI wants to hack into this phone so that they can get information about the attacker. However, I believe that Apple should keep their security the way it is. Creating a backdoor could make Apple customers vulnerable to other hackers using that software.
ReplyDeleteI agree with this statement.
DeleteCreating a Backdoor will make apple users more vulnerable, making Apple a less trustworthy company.
DeleteI agree with this statement. By creating the code, it could potentially get to the public and make its users exposed to hackers.
Delete-Nuhash Bhuiyan
However, any skilled hacker could make this code themselves and if they get their hands on your phone, they could hack into it with ease. Therefore, this backdoor has been open for a long time. ;)
DeleteI agree with you, if Apple changes their security it could ruin their brand name and they could lose customers.
DeleteWell I kinda agree and disagree about it. Well yes Apple customers needs privacy on their phone, but if the FBI needs to see your phone, they haft to hack on the phone
DeleteExactly Tanay. That is my point as well.
DeleteThe FBI should have Apple's assistance in this situation. Although Apple is not required to help, they could potentially save lives by using the find to track other terrorist attacks. Human lives are more important than a company's policy.
ReplyDelete- Alex Rahi
I agree that it could save lives and avoid attacks. I also think however that the software Apple would create to hack the phone could be given to the wrong people and this could compromise the security of all the iPhone owners.
DeleteI agree with your viewpoint. I believe that many lives could be saved if Apple helps the FBI.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteJust because they can, doesn't mean they have to. The FBI can think of and suggest other solutions to this, or come to a compromise with Apple rather than force them into doing something they don't want to do for a reason. This could potentially ruin the future of Apple.
DeleteI don't think Apple should be forced to help the FBI hack the phone. The FBI has the rights to the phone, but I do not think they have the right to force Apple to create a code, which is considered speech under the first amendment. I think this would be a violation of Apple's constitutional rights to free speech.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that Apple should not be forced to hack the iPhone by the FBI. The fact that the code and what is on the phone are considered free speech is something we need to protect as a nation and a people.
Delete-Eric Potak
I believe Apple should write the code so the FBI can get information in the phone. However, I don't think they should be forced to do so because under the law they are not. I think they need to come to a mutual agreement on this situation.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you. Apple should be willing to help the FBI for the sake of our nation's security, but they shouldn't be forced to do so.
Delete-Teresa Smaltz
I get the whole "Tarnishing the apple Brand", but the reasoning for the code was a situation that involved a threat to national security, also it could possibly prevent other attacks. I don't believe it would make apple consumers feel unsafe with there privacy. There needs to be a win-win situation for the FBI and Apple. What I do like is how Apple is exercising their rights in the Constitution.
ReplyDeleteIn this case, i believe Apple should get the FBI into their phone, the data contained on this phone could help prevent future terrorist attacks and also lead to the people that organized the attacks. I could see how apple could think that it would invade their customers privacy, but stopping future attacks on our country and the people in it,is more important.
ReplyDeleteI understand why the FBI would want to look at the phone. If code is considered speech, then I do not think the FBI can force Apple to write the code that would allow the FBI to get this data. I think that Apple is also being reasonable since this could affect how private people perceive iPhones as being.
ReplyDelete-Megan Marshall
I agree with you on all accounts. I think the FBI needs to recognize precedence in terms of code being protected, but I think we should try to prevent terrorism.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteMegan, That is a very good point. I am not sure that many people your age would look at code as free speech. Very good angle. Mr. Frazee
DeleteIt seems that complying to the court ruling will just cause problems for Apple. Breaking their own security hurts the brand and national reputations. Even if Apple wrote the code, the FBI would still have to try combinations before they get in. We don't even know if the data on this phone is worth it! I'm sure we can find a hacker somewhere that can do this.
ReplyDelete-Mitchell Deller
While I personally believe that Apple should comply with the FBI, ethically it is wrong. This would make Apple users exposed in terms of security. However, this phone can have information that will provide valuable information that could help the FBI in their investigation. Both sides make understandable arguments, but I believe that Apple should not be forced to provide codes to help the FBI in this case.
ReplyDelete-Nuhash Bhuiyan
I think both sides have a reason but i think the FBI's reason is more important. Apple doesnt want to give up their codes to the FBI but this is about a terrist attack. This selfishness by apple could cost many american lives and that is something we should not risk
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion, the FBI should receive this information. It is crucial to figuring out who was working with the terrorists, but Apple is right; if they use this code, it could make Apple users uneasy. In my opinion, there is no reason that they should be uneasy. Apple would use this code against anyone else and the code doesn't pull information out.
ReplyDeleteI meant to say Apple wouldn't use this code.
DeleteBy doing this, Apple could potentially expose all of their customers. Depending on how many people are used to make this code that Apple is being asked to make, are you sure that you can trust all of them not to let it out to the public?
Deleteif the code is considered speech then the government would be violating the first amendment.
DeleteThe FBI have the right to search on your phone only if there something suspicious. But Apple should have the code only for suspicious scene. Because it will ruin the customers private policy if the FBI just hack whoever they want to
ReplyDeleteI think that Apple should not be mandated to give the phone to Apple. If the code is considered speech, then the government would be violating the first amendment. Regardless of who owns the phone, I think that apple should not unlock it.
ReplyDelete- Sudeep Yedulla
I think Apple should let the FBI hack into the terrorists phone. Even though Apple isnt required to help they should because it can prevent future terrorist attacks. I think that would be best but it could ruin the Apple brand and reputation because they are not required to help and they are exposing private information.
ReplyDelete-Rhea Farooq
The phone might not have any relevant information that would prevent terrorism. I think Apple should not help since this code could be used on other iPhones.
DeleteI see the FBI's point of view, but I believe security, privacy, and rights of the people are more important in this case. Why doesn't the FBI hire an independent hacker to get into the phone instead of bullying Apple to? And if Apple writes the code, it could cause other security issues..
ReplyDeleteI agree with you. You are right that they should get an independent hacker to hack the phone and get the information they are looking for, and Apple shouldn't be forced to do this for FBI.
Delete-Fatemeh Razfar
I'm on FBI's side and i think that our safety is more important. I know that Apple shouldn't be forced to hack the phone but maybe there is something in the phone that would help us find a way.
ReplyDelete-Fatemeh Razfar
I agree. I think that Apple should help the FBI because it could possibly save many lives and help prevent future attacks.
DeleteI think that both Apple and FBI make reasonable arguments. Forcing Apple to write the code might make regular users vulnerable. However, I think that Apple should provide the codes for the FBI because the phone could potentially prevent another terrorist attack.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Victoria because both apple and FBI have a reasonable argument. Both of them are trying to do their job.
DeleteiPhone users want their privacy safe and secure. Privacy is just another one of those little things that make a huge selling point and provides people with comfort and full freedom to take full advantage of the iPhone's power. This case isn't impossible, maybe if the code was written secretly, but immediately patched before using it, Apple can send an update to all iPhones that installs this patch.
ReplyDelete-Waseem Idelbi
I think that both Apple and The FBI make reasonable arguments about this topic. If the FBI made Apple write a code, it could get out to the public and be used for the wrong reasons. Although, it could help prevent future attacks against our country if the FBI were able to get into the phone and uncover the data inside
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Deletehey
DeleteAcutely aloft adequate response. I concur with your contemplation.
Deletepip-pip cheerio
In the case of Apple being forced to hack into the San Berandino shooter's phone is special. I believe that Apple should not be able to hack into the phone as once this technology is created, this information can become leaked, threatening iphone users around the world. This inevitable invasion of privacy is against the most fundamental constitutional rights of being an american citizen.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your argument here, Apple shouldn't be forced into writing a code to unlock the phone because what if it gets into the wrong hands?
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI don’t think the FBI should be able to do that. Apple has the right to do what they want to their company so, it isn’t right for them to take them to court. FBI has some points but not enough for them to get cell phone access.
ReplyDeleteI think that Apple really has no choice on this matter because they have been ordered by court once already and they don't have a strong enough defense to beat the odds. Apple almost should have a feeling of needing to do this even if they have to say its for the family's for those who died. Its not like they are doing it to ever ones phone or they have to hack it all they really need to do is turn off the fail safe.
ReplyDeleteJosh Hineman
Once Apple creates this form of technology, what makes you think that the coding will not be leaked, even threatening your brand new iphone 6?
DeleteI agree Cameron, if they can make it, I believe it eventually will be leaked and used for bad intentions. If apple can make this code to unlock peoples phone,so can hackers.
DeleteI believe Apple should not comply with the FBI to hack this dudes phone. If they do it to one person they should be able to do it to everyone, and eventually the code will get out to the public or get leaked, that would be disaster. Apple would be doing the right thing not helping the FBI
ReplyDeletei sort of agree to what connor said but at the same time the FBI are just doing their job. if by going through one person phone will help the nation apple should at least work something with the FBI
DeleteBecause it helps America become safer I think that Apple should help the FBI. They may not want to do it for the safety of their customers, but if they give the FBI the information then they can help more than just their customers. Apple shouldn't be able to go against a court order either because it makes them seem above the law, which they aren't.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you because apple should do it for the safety of their customers not the fear of losing them. Apple shouldn't go against the court order they were given.
DeleteI can see how by giving the FBI the codes it could make all the regular customers vulnerable because they have no privacy whatsoever. However, for cases that could prevent future terrorist attacks I think the FBI should get the codes from Apple. Both the FBI and Apple make valid arguments in this case.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you because if Apple customers wanted America safe them they would allow the FBI to look at the terrorist's phone knowing that they shouldn't have anything to hide. If they did have something that they don't want them to find, then they probably shouldn't have it.
DeleteI agree with you that they both make valid arguments and that with the threats of terrorism Apple should make a code for the FBI.
DeleteI believe apple should help the FBI because it could help prevent the terrorist attacks or minimize them. But Apple should live up to their word and keep peoples privacy. Since they went to court for it I would have just given them the pass code.
ReplyDeleteI agree because it shouldn't be a problem for the FBI to get the password and possibly save lives.
Deletei'm not really sure which side i should take because both make sense. The FBI job is to protect the nation against terrorist if by going through apple phone will help them apple should give it to them FBI just doing their job. At the same time people need their privacy as a smartphone company is their job to protect the privacy of their customer.
ReplyDeleteThink about it this way, if people were the targets of terrorist attacks, then I think that they would give up their privacy. If Apple does help them then many lives could be saved in the future. Would you give up your life for privacy? (Amanda)
DeleteI think apple should let the FBI hack into the phone for many reasons. My first reason is they can possibly save millions of lives, second they might be able to find the locations of the people that are going to attack and when the will. But at the same time i dont because some important info might spread to the public.-Daunte Barden.
ReplyDeletei would agree because it would save lives if they had access to the phone, but what if the phone has nothing on it. How would that affect us going through all this trouble for nothing.
DeleteI think apple should hack into the phone because it can prevent future terrorist attacks. It is not invading privacy if it is preventing people from getting killed. apple cant disobey the court order they were given
ReplyDeleteMegan
I agree with you because it is for the better of America and their safety. You are right about it not invading privacy because it prevent people from getting killed and it can prevent future terrorist attacks.
DeleteI agree with you! If we are preventing future attacks then we are saving lives. But also someone could accidentally or purposely release the code and then people can be hacking into other peoples phones. Being nosy because they have nothing better to do with their life.
DeleteI'm going to have to agree to disagree with you on that. The fact that it might prevent people from getting killed doesnt change the fact that it's invading privacy... and apple can disobey the court order because code is considered speech and so they have the right to not do anything
DeleteI think that Apple and the FBI both have arguments that go against each other for reasons they prioritize. Apple has to protect its users but also if the code they made for the FBI were to get out it could cause serious damage for the company and also its users by creating a way into it's security. However, from the FBI side by getting this information they could potentially stop a future attack by getting into it.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI believe that apple should not open the phone up for the FBI. It is a violation of privacy which apple has a contract with its customers. And if apple does let the fbi get access to the phone. Then what about other countries which has the same situation? would you give china or Russia access to apple iphones within there countries? - nyle
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI also agree with what you're saying and that giving the FBI access can bring up many questions. One of which is if they do get access then is there really such a thing as personal privacy? -Anmol P.
DeleteIts never been seen that way and I like the angle your coming from what if other countries got access to the code a lot more than 14 lives could be at stake.
DeleteI believe that Apple should not be forced to open up iPhones for the FBI to investigate. Even though terrorism is something that should be prevented, it should happen in legal ways. Forcing businesses to unlock their technology is dangerous because hackers with mal-intentions can get in as well. The FBI should only be able to get the information on the phone if they have a warrant to the information. - Rahul Soni
ReplyDeleteFrom my understanding the FBI is requesting a so called "backdoor" for the iPhone, and for future ios. Apple has refused because its simply a invasion of privacy.It is also dangerous because if this "backdoor" is leaked then anyone could hack into anyone's iPhone. This leads to more devices being susceptible to ransom-ware where anyone could lock you out of your device. It is also somewhat a matter of security because the information on the phone could be valuable, and prevent future attacks.
ReplyDelete-Brandon Manautou
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI agree with you. I think this would cause a serious problem for Apple, and phone security would diminish a great deal.
DeleteI think that Apple should work with the FBI. If the customers become terrorists then I believe their right to privacy gets taken away. Also if doing this can prevent the lives of many in the future, then this should be done for the common good. (Amanda Le)
ReplyDeleteI understand that the information on the phone could be valuable,and prevent future attacks.But if it were leaked many people would be able to get in other people devices,and do malicious things.How many rights do we have to give up for our safety?
Delete-Brandon Manautou
I agree with you! These terrorists have lost their right to privacy. But there's no way to put a cap on it. Once a back door is opened up or written into the apple contract then everyone loses their right to privacy even law abiding citizens.
DeleteI believe Apple should not have to succumb to the court order that forces the company to create code to hack into the iPhone. I think a backdoor would be a great resource to go further into evidence, but it breaks many laws. As a company, Apple should not have to ruin its image and reputation. I think there should be a middle ground between the FBI and Apple, where evidence can still be attainable.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI agree that there should be some middle ground that should be worked out. Initially I was against FBI breaking into the phone's data at all costs, but now I realize with the consent of the county and the protection of the nation, there should be some middle ground that both the FBI and Apple agree to solve this issue.
Delete-Ansh Chaudhari
I don't think apple should have to code a backdoor method to get into the iphone. Legally speaking, code is considered speech so apple has the right to not "say" anything. It's a violation of rights and apple isn't doing anything wrong in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteThat's interesting. I never thought of code as a form of speech. In that sense, it would coincide with the first amendment with freedom of speech, and if FBI forces them, they would be violating that amendment.
Delete-Ansh Chaudhari
I disagree Daniel. There might be information about future attacks or more people that were involved in this attack that could help the FBI. In these circumstances I think apple should open the phone. They do have a warrant.
DeleteI agree with you. Typing code is almost the same as saying something, like texting someone is conveying a message. Therefore, code should be considered under free speech in the First Amendment.
DeleteI think that Apple is right in choosing to deny the FBI access to the iPhone. To me, this is not a question of just stopping terrorists but also a matter of maintaining our personal privacy. I do think that a middle ground can be met because I believe personal privacy is a very important thing that we must maintain. -Anmol P.
ReplyDeleteApple should comply and help the FBI, overall their compliance will do more good than harm. If apple can help the FBI make a 'backdoor' then it could help get into many more criminals phones and would better the world. Apple is not above the law and it should be happy to help a country that is trying to keep its citizens safe.
ReplyDeleteWhat law would Apple technically be trying to be above? And how would we know that the backdoor would not be hacked and used for more wrong causes than right?
DeleteMaybe for this one particular situation it may do good, but it doesn't mean that invading privacy is good overall. You wouldn't allow the FBI to invade someone's house if they were looking for information without taking the right steps, so would you allow it in this situation. Citizens have a right to privacy and its the governments job to secure the citizens while protecting our rights. - Rahul Soni
Deletei agree but there should be warrants to allow to get threw the phone. i wouldn't want to give the government full access unwarranted searches threw a phone. other wise we'd mistakenly be recorded or track for suspicious behavior when we didn't do anything. The People should have some what a privacy.
DeleteI totally agree, by searching the phone the FBI could find terrorist connections and possibly stop someone else from being killed. I dont think apples privacy policy applies to a terrorist. Especially if the FBI have a legal warrant to search the phone anyway.
DeleteEven though the FBI only wants to find out information regarding a terrorist attack Apple does have a policy that they have to stay by. Forcing Apple to have to open the IPhone would not make it okay, plus after doing it once other government agencies would expect Apple to do it again.
ReplyDelete-Gracie Lopez
I agree with Apple to a certain extent and I don't blame the FBI for taking this to court. However all of us have the right to privacy. If Apple does open up a back door it gives up the security and privacy of their users along with giving the company a bad name. I understand the FBIs concern but I don't necessarily think that hacking into a phone will give them all the information they need.
ReplyDeleteThe FBI should not be able to receive access to the iPhone from Apple due to the many security issues that could rise. If the software backdoor is created, it brings up many other cases of which governments of other countries such as China and Russia can request access to iPhones, as Apple is an international company. People could also feel unsafe with Apple products if they know that there is a software that could be used to access all of their personal files and such.
ReplyDeleteI strongly disagree Sumanth. Which do you value more? Privacy or lives? This case and many just like it can help save lives and prevent future terrorist attacks.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThink about the possibility of more lives being lost due to terrorists' access to a program that could give them access to all private files on peoples' cell phones. Private details could be exposed to people who want to do wrong.
DeleteWhat the FBI is doing is forcing Apple to give them a way to bypass the security of anyone's phone. If you were to do that, then there would be a code made specifically for invading privacy. Now I agree that the FBI should not be able to force Apple to create a code as it is a direct violation of the first amendment; however I also know that the FBI hires some of the best coders in the world and if they really wanted to get into the phone all that they would have to do is have one of their coders write something up.
ReplyDeleteForcing Apple to create a code that bypasses the encryption is wrong. Apple should not be forced to create a code that will allow others to get entry into someone else's phone. If such a code is created, private security will be lost and hackers will have easy access to personal information. Although this is for national defense and security, the FBI cannot force Apple to do this.
ReplyDelete-Ansh Chaudhari
I like apples policy on privacy and how far they are going to keep it. On the other hand I also believe they should make exceptions on certain cases like this one. I am caught in the middle in this situation but if I had to make a choice I would have to go with apple shouldn't make the code or at least shouldn't have to.
ReplyDeleteLegally Apple is not required to grant access to the terrorists phone. The FBI has little to no information about this attack. And without out knowing why, or who triggered the deaths of innocent people we can't fix anything, or prevent any of these viscous attacks to reoccur. Considering the circumstances, I think Apple should comply with the FBI to try and figure out why these terrorists attacked.
ReplyDeleteI think that apple should unlock the phone. If this a national security risk and if the FBI has a legal warrant to search the phone to prevent further attacks and to find out terrorist connections then by all means hack the phone.
ReplyDeleteI understand that national security is a big concern in this case, but what happens after this incident? Will the FBI or any third party be allowed to hack into someone's phones and that be ok? The risks ,in my opinion, do not outweigh the rewards in this case and would case more issues down the road.
DeleteI think that Apple has a right to protect their technology and the privacy of their customers. However, I also think that the government is responsible for protecting the citizens of the US, and that this phone is a fundamental key to help the government do their job. In this case I think that the government should be given a backdoor by Apple to bypass the encryption, as whatever information on the phone that could be used to find possible terrorists, is more important than keeping the privacy of their customers.
ReplyDelete-Brinda
I agree with the fact that the FBI needs to protect its citizens, but I believe that Apple should not have to create the code to unlock the iPhone. This is because the code is protected by the first amendment and this technology could also potentially be used in a harmful way.
Delete-Kaitlyn Pollock
I believe that Apple should not be required to open up the iPhone. It is a slippery slope and illegal searches and seizures have been outlawed for centuries. Not only that, but they decided that the what was on the iPhone is considered speech, and first amendment rights are in jeopardy if we illegally search that iPhone
ReplyDelete-Eric Potak
I also agree. To me, this is too big of an invasion of privacy in this case for apple not to fight back. -Anmol P.
DeleteI think in this case Apple should work with the FBI. I understand that we're all entitled to our privacy but what privacy is there when it's involved with terrorist attacks and our societies safety? Apple isn't above the law, simply they wanna make sure we're safe. -Arihanna Caforio
ReplyDeleteI understand why the FBI would want to have Apple unlock the iPhone, but I believe that the United States government cannot force Apple to do this. Due to the fact that Apple would have to make a code to do this and one of the articles said that code is part of freedom of speech the government should not force Apple to unlock the iPhone. Also the problem is this new code could potentially be realized to the public and be used in a negative way. I also understand the FBI reasoning of needing the phone unlocked to protect against possible terrorist attacks. Overall, despite the FBI's reasoning I believe Apple should not be forced to create a code to help unlock the iPhone.
ReplyDelete-Kaitlyn Pollock
I agree with you saying that code is considered free speech and as such by forcing Apple is infringing upon their rights to free speech, however I think that the security of people is much more important. It doesn't seen logical to say that the government should protect the privacy and livelihoods of the citizens, and not protect the actual lives of said citizens. This is a matter of national security and Apple could and should be more cooperative with the government on the matter of this phone.
DeleteWhy should this case be any different to past cases where the government has needed an Apple phone to be opened for the case. That's the point it should't, plus it could just be a dead end.
ReplyDelete